NDAQ - 2022 Review - Worst Year To Date -10% / -34%

Summary

• If you assume all my MOEX stocks are worth 0, I am down 34%. If you take the MOEX stocks at their current value, I am down c10%.
• I also have various GDRs and a reasonable weight in JEMA – formerly JP Morgan Russian. So if all Russian stocks are a 0, you can probably knock another 3-5% off.
• We will see what happens with the Russian holdings but I am not optimistic.
• My coal stocks have done well but I can’t see them going much higher with coal being 5-10x more than the historic trend. I have sold down and am now running the profit.

So time for my usual review of the year. As ever, I’m not writing this exactly at the end of the year so figures may be a bit fuzzy; in general they are pretty accurate.

As expected, it hasn’t been a good one. If you assume all my MOEX stocks are worth 0, I am down 34%. If you take the MOEX stocks at their current value, I am down c10%. This is very rough. I also have various GDRs and a reasonable weight in JEMA – formerly JP Morgan Russian. So if all Russian stocks are a 0, you can probably knock another 3-5% off.

My traditional charts/table are below – including figures *roughly* assuming Russian holdings are worth 0. It’s a little more complex than this as there are pretty substantial dividends in a blocked account in Russia and quite a few GDRs valued at nominal values. I could easily be up 10-20% if you assume the world goes back to ‘normal’ and my assets are not seized, although at present this seems a distant prospect.

We will see what happens with the Russian holdings but I am not optimistic. If the Ukraine war continues along its current path, Russia will lose to superior Western technology/Russia depleting their stocks.

The Russian view seems to be to have a long drawn out war – winning by attrition/weight of numbers/economics. The EU is still burning stored Russian gas, with limited capacity for resupply over the next two years; 2023/2024 may be very difficult.

I don’t think this will change the EU’s position but it might. Another likely way this ends is nuclear/chemical weapons as it’s the only way Russia can neutralise the Ukrainian/Western technological advantage.

A coup/Putin being removed is another possibility, as is Chinese resupply/upgrade of Russian technology (though far, far less likely). I think the longer this continues, the more likely Russian reserves are seized to pay for reconstruction and western holdings are seized in retaliation.

I still hold JEMA (JPMorgan Emerging Europe, Middle East & Africa Securities) (formerly known as JP Morgan Russian) as I get a 5x return if we go back to ‘normal’, 50% loss if assets are seized.

If you are in the US and can’t buy JEMA, a similar, (but much, much worse) alternative is CEE (Central Europe and Russia Fund). I might write about it if JP Morgan does something dodgy and forces me to switch. There is some news suggesting a 50% haircut – actually a c2.5x return would be a decent win.

All the above of course doesn’t imply I support the war in any way. I always say this but buying secondhand Russian stocks does nothing to support Putin/the war. Nothing I do changes anything in the real world.

H2 has if anything been worse than H1. My coal stocks have done well but I can’t see them going much higher with coal being 5-10x more than the historic trend . I have sold down and am now running the profit.

I have struggled with volatility and sold down some things which in retrospect I regret – notably SILJ (Junior Silver Miners) and COPX (Copper Miners). It is partly as I think we could be due for a major recession and much silver/copper demand is industrial.

Still think that these metals will do well as production is very constrained but I am better off avoiding equity ETFs in future. I am better off in my usual area of dirt cheap equities – that I can have faith in and hold. The issue is I find it very, very difficult to find resource stocks that I actually want to invest in.

I’m still at my limit in terms of natural resource stocks, maybe the switch from more discretionary/industrial copper/silver to non-discretionary energy will help.

Energy has done quite poorly, despite very low valuations. For example Serica ( SQZZF ) I am c20% down despite it having over half the market cap in cash and forecast PE under 2/3. It's currently investigating a merger/takeover. I dislike the deal at first glance but haven't yet fully run the numbers and don’t have complete information.

PetroTal ( PTALF ) – again did poorly, down about 20% due to issues in Peru, forecast PE under 2, c1/3rd of the market cap in cash.

GKP ( GUKYF ) ( GFKSY ) with a c40% yield, PE under 2 and minimal extraction cost – albeit with a severe expropriation risk (in my view) – that I have managed to hedge.

My other oil and gas companies are in a similar vein. I am not sure if it’s woke investors still not investing, or if they are pricing in a severe drop in oil prices. Most of these companies are very profitable at $70/oil and profitable down to $50.

With China re-opening and Biden refilling the strategic Petroleum reserve at $70, I can’t understand why they are trading where they are. Others I hold such as CNOOC (883.hk) ( CEOHF ), HBR, KIST, Romgaz are not as cheap but I need to diversify as these smaller oilers have a tendency to suffer from mishaps, rusting tanks, production problems, rapacious governments and there aren’t enough of them around to let them make up the bulk of the portfolio.

Currently, I am at 35% so a big weight and which broadly hasn’t worked this year over the time period I have owned them. I won’t buy more and plan to limit my size to c5% per company.

We will see if these rerate in 2022. There is a lot to dislike about them. Firstly, that they continue to invest despite being so lowly rated. Why invest growth capex if you are valued at a PE of 2/3 and a substantial proportion of your market cap is cash?

Far better to just distribute/maintain production in my view. I find it interesting that Warren Buffett insists on maintaining control of his companies' surplus cash flow and exerts tight control on their investment decisions whilst far too many value investors are prepared to give management far too much credit and control.

The downside to these companies investing to grow is they are *generally* rolling the dice with exploration and it's an unwise game to play, as there is lots of scope for them to not find oil/gas. Even if they acquire, there are plenty of bad deals out there and scope for corruption at worst, or very bad decision making at best.

I don't trust or rate any of the managements but the stocks are so cheap, I will tolerate them for now/until I find better alternatives.

It’s a little frustrating, when I look back to start my 2022 portfolio, I had plenty of oil and gas – though far too much was in IOG which I had a lucky escape from. I looked for more in early 2022 but was looking for the best quality oil and gas companies, which on the metrics I look at all happened to be in Russia. Frustrating to get the sector right but not consider that all my oil and gas exposure was in Russia so, ultimately it didn’t work out.

I am not sure how much of this lowly valuation is down to ESG/environmental concerns. I suspect this affects it greatly. On the rare occasions I meet people new to investing, ESG is the first thing they ask about and it is really important to many corporates – as it’s the flavor du jour.

I believe it to be entirely delusional – the entire system is broken and irredeemably corrupt and I’m prepared to embrace this fact, rather than deny it. We will see if this works over the next few years. I suspect hard times will cure people of the ESG delusion but we shall see.

The counter-argument is that non-ESG companies can’t raise capital so are not as cheap as they appear. I do not believe this is the case in the longer term – the cynical will once again inherit the earth.

I have tended to get into the habit of buying these stocks on good news, expecting this to trigger rerating, then selling on bad news, which comes along with surprising regularity. The goal for 2023 is to buy as cheap as possible than just hold. Selling the tops looks appealing but once it becomes clear that oil is not going to $50/ESG doesn’t matter then the rerating could be formidable, even a 5x cash adjusted PE will give JSE/PTAL 100%+ in terms of share price.

In terms of my other resource companies, Tharissa is still very cheap. I have traded a little in and out with a minimal level of success, though like the oil companies they are a stock trading sub-NAV on a tiny multiple and, of course, the conclusion they come to is it’s time to invest in Zimbabwe, rather than a buyback or return cash via dividends. Brilliant guys, brilliant.

Kenmare ( KMRPF ) is also cheap on a forward PE of under 3, one of the world’s largest producers, at the lowest cost and a 10% yield. The issue is that if we are heading into a major recession, this may hit demand and pricing. Nevertheless it can easily be argued that this is in the price.

Uranium is still a reasonable weight but it's very much a slow burner for me – I am sure it will be vital for generation in the future but when the price will move to incentivise new production remains unknown.

I still think KAP is undervalued, though it hasn’t done well over the last year. In breach of my no sector ETFs rule, I still own URNM , very volatile but I have cut the weight down to a level I can tolerate.

The real money in uranium will be likely made in the technology/building the plants but nothing out there I can buy – Rolls-Royce ( RYCEY ) just looks too expensive and there is too much of a history of massive losses occurring during the development of new nuclear technology.

One of my better performers over the year has been DNA2. This consists of Airbus A380s which were trading at a significant discount to NAV. When I bought they were trading at a discount to expected dividend payments.

In a similar vein I have bought some AA4 (Amedeo AirFour Plus). If dividends are paid as expected, I hope to get about 20-30p a share over the next 5 years; then the question is what are/will the assets be worth?

Emirates are refurbishing some of the A380s so I think there is a decent prospect they will be bought/re-leased at the end of their contract or at least have some value. We are in a rising interest rate environment now and the cost of airframes is a major part of an airline’s cost.

If they buy new at a c0-x% financing rate then, perhaps fuel/efficiency savings make new planes worthwhile. This calculation changes if they are having to buy new, with a higher capital value at a higher interest rate – making the used aircraft relatively more attractive and economical.

There are also delivery issues across Boeing and Airbus , again helping the used market. Offsetting this, air travel is not yet back to 2019 levels and a severe recession/high fuel prices may kill demand further.

Still my bet is on the A380s being worth something and the A350s also having a bit of value. With a c16% yield if they hit their target, I get paid to wait, though some of this is capital being returned, though it's hard to say how much as we don’t really know how much the assets are worth.

Begbies Traynor is another big weight but has not done much, given its now increased weight with the potentially permanent demise of my Russian holdings. I think it’s a useful hedge for the rest of the portfolio. It’s one I need to cut on account of excessive weight.

I’m broadly amazed how strong everything is. UK energy bills have risen to a typical c£4279 in January 2023. UK GDP per capita is roughly c£32,000 - post tax this is 25k so energy is now 17% of net pay.

This is a big rise from c £1100 or 4% pre-war. The average person/household doesn’t pay this directly – as it's capped by the government at c£2500 . This is, of course, not entirely accurate – the subsidy will be paid by taxpayers eventually.

I’m aware I am mixing household and individual figures – but the principle applies lots of money is effectively gone. Various windfall taxes can shift burden around a bit. Don’t forget the median person earns under £32k – due to skew from high earners.

If you couple this with rising food prices/mortgage rates and no certainty on how long this will last and I am amazed shares are as resilient as they have been. I suspect this is driven by the hope that this is temporary. I have my doubts as to this.

I have tried a few shorts as hedges – broadly they haven’t worked. My main bet has been to assume the consumer – squeezed by insanely high house prices/rents and mortgage rates, high energy costs and rising tax would cut back.

I have shorted SMWH (WH Smith ( WHTPF )) and CPG (Compass Group ( CMPGF )). Unfortunately we are still seeing recovery from COVID in year on year comparisons and there appears to be little fall-off in consumer demand. It could be I am in the wrong sectors. SMWH do *mostly* convenience retail at travel locations, CPG outsourced food services.

I thought these would be very easy for people to cut back on. For example, bringing a chocolate bar bought at a supermarket for 25-35p rather than buying one at SMWH for £1. This hasn't worked as yet.

It's possible people are cutting back on things like clothes rather than convenience items/lunch at the office, etc. This actually makes a lot of sense as the saving from not buying that extra jacket equals many chocolate bars.

I find it very difficult to anticipate what the average person spends on/will cut back on. I’m sticking with the shorts for now – these companies are valued at PEs of 19 and 23. In a rising rate environment, I just can’t see them continuing to grow.

Nevertheless I am approaching the point at which I will be stopped out. A more positive short is my short on TMO – Time Out – very small, heavily indebted, both an online listings magazine and local cuisine market business, it was not making money even before inflation-induced belt tightening.

I could do with a few more like this, but many seem to be on PEs of 10, so whilst I think they only look cheap due to peak earnings, it’s not a bet I am willing to make. I haven’t been able to make money shorting the GameStops/AMCs.

I’m not wired to tolerate large drawdowns on a stock that is going up that I already think is overvalued. Tempted to keep going with small attempts at this to try and learn to be more able to put my finger on the pulse of the crowd and get it near the top. I’m far better at picking the bottom on a stock.

I also shorted NASDAQ ( NDAQ ) (Dec 16th 9900) via puts – didn't work – though was in profit much of the time. In addition, I switched some of my cash from GBP to CHF – pretty much at the low, currently down 5.7%.

I’m not tempted to switch back – I have no faith in the UK economy – current account deficit of 5% – before imported energy cost hikes really kick in, coupled with a budget deficit of 7.2% of GDP.

The rest of the West isn't much better. This also explains my reasonably healthy weight in gold. I can't be sure where the bottom is and want to hold ‘cash’, only I don’t want to hold actual cash as I have no faith my cash won't be devalued so gold or a ‘hard’ currency such as CHF is probably next best thing.

In terms of life, this year’s loss has been a major blow. I was planning to quit the world of employment in early 2022, but the situation is such that I have postponed it. If we assume my direct Russian holdings are a 0, I have gone from having c45 year’s spending covered last year to only around 25 years.

It doesn't help that I was badly hit by the inflation – my consumption is heavily food/energy-based. Not sure what the next steps are – I still work part time, in a pretty straight-forward remote job but am increasingly fed up of the world of employment.

I do wonder whether if I were not splitting my time I would have made the Russian error/put quite as much as I did in. I was looking for a substantial quick win. For a lot of years I have thought about moving somewhere cheaper than the UK, probably Eastern Europe.

The problem at the moment is this would involve pulling more money from my somewhat diminished portfolio as well as a big change in lifestyle. I am waiting for either the job to finish or my energy companies to substantially rerate – so I am not leaving so much on the table when I pull out the funds to move country.

Detailed holdings are below:

There is a little leverage here, but plenty of cash/gold to offset this – so in effect this is a small bet against fiat. I view it as actually being c14.9% cash.

I sold some BXP this year as I was forced to by my broker dropping it from my ISA. I still like it.

I sold DCI, Dolphin Capital ( DOLHF ) – after many years of holding. I think rate rises have changed the relative picture, with this trading at a c 67% discount to a potentially unreliable NAV, whilst I can buy something like BBOX for a 42% discount to NAV but it’s far more legitimate, and has solid cashflow.

I don’t own BBOX yet – I will when/if I can pick it up for a much lower cash flow multiple. After rate rises I don’t entirely trust the NAVs of these companies/realizability at this NAV.

It’s a very different world at higher rates, particularly as rates continue to rise. There is a counter-argument as inflation can raise the value of some property/rate rises may be temporary but it’s not a bet I am willing to make at the moment. I am going to be looking for cheap/sold off property but will value it primarily based on FCF/dividend yield.

In terms of sector the split is as follows:

I’m heavily weighted towards natural resources/energy. Actually, it’s worse that as my Russian stocks and my Romanian fund Fondul Proprietea are both heavily natural resource/energy price linked.

There is a powerful counter-argument – in that rate rises kill demand and with it the marginal buyer causing high resource prices – so a small decrease in economic activity could cause a large fall in resource company prices.

It’s a credible argument and part of why I pulled out from silver/copper miners (mostly) in the summer. My counter-argument is that there is still a lack of investment. Many of the stocks I own have large cash piles and high cashflow per share – they mostly pay for themselves in two/ three years.

In even a long dip they should do okay and supply shortages may mean they can rise out of any recession – in 2008/9 energy and resources performed surprisingly strongly.

I am going to limit any further weight to natural resources – though I might switch between stocks, tempted to cut the more mainstream oil and gas companies in favour of more exotic holdings if I can find stocks of sufficient quality.

I am not in a rush to buy anything – unless it is really cheap or cheap and low risk/quick return. Very little out there really is appealing, though I am continually drawn to Royal Mail as a decent business, going through a difficult patch that will likely rerate.

I’d like to switch cash/gold into undervalued investment trusts/very cheap businesses with high margins and large cash piles, but, as ever, these seem to be hard to find.

As ever, comments are appreciated. All the best for 2023!

Original Post

Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.

For further details see: