IWV - COWZ Vs. TTAC: Highlighting The Importance Of Cash And Active Management
Summary
- Both COWZ and TTAC use free cash flow to filter in high-quality stocks from the Russel 1000 and Russell 3000 indices, respectively.
- Also, as actively-managed ETFs, they have proved to be less volatile than ETFs, which track the Russell indexes more passively.
- Also, when compared to TTAC, COWZ is better for those seeking regular income and also offers better protection against volatility.
- This thesis highlights the importance of free cash flow yield and not the absolute cash position which some investors tend to prioritize as insulation to liquidity problems.
For further details see:
COWZ Vs. TTAC: Highlighting The Importance Of Cash And Active Management