Twitter

Link your Twitter Account to Market Wire News


When you linking your Twitter Account Market Wire News Trending Stocks news and your Portfolio Stocks News will automatically tweet from your Twitter account.


Be alerted of any news about your stocks and see what other stocks are trending.



home / news releases / GRIN - Grindrod Shipping Holdings Ltd. First Half 2019 Financial Results


GRIN - Grindrod Shipping Holdings Ltd. First Half 2019 Financial Results

SINGAPORE, Aug. 28, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Grindrod Shipping Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: GRIN) (JSE: GSH) (“Grindrod Shipping” or “Company” or “we” or “us” or “our”), a global provider of maritime transportation services in the drybulk and product tanker sectors, today announced its first half 2019 earnings results for the period ended June 30, 2019.

Financial Highlights for the first half of the year ended June 30, 2019

  • Revenues of $167.2 million
  • Gross profit of $5.9 million
  • Adjusted EBITDA of $14.7 million(2)
  • Loss for the period of ($19.0 million) or ($0.99) per ordinary share including a ($4.3) million impairment loss on vessel sales
  • Handysize and Supramax/Ultramax TCE per day of $7,030 and $10,481, respectively, outperformed the Baltic Handysize TC Index (“BHSI”) and Baltic Supramax-58 TC Index (“BSI-58”) benchmarks by approximately 22.2% and 34.2% respectively(1)(2)
  • Medium Range (“MR”) product tanker TCE per day of $14,276 outperformed Clarksons’ Average MR Clean Earnings per day assessment of $12,448 by approximately 14.7%, and small tanker TCE per day of $12,015(1)(2)
  • Period end cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) of $50.5 million

(1) The proportionate share of our joint ventures is not reflected in our condensed consolidated and combined statement of profit and loss, but is reflected in our segment results.   
(2) Adjusted EBITDA and TCE per day are non-GAAP financial measures. For the definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, please refer to the definitions and reconciliations at the end of this press release.

Operational Highlights for the first half of the year ended June 30, 2019

  • We sold the 2005-built Handysize vessel IVS Kawana for a gross price of $7.8 million with delivery to the buyers in April 2019.
  • We took delivery of the IVS Phoenix, a Japanese-built eco ultramax drybulk carrier newbuilding in June 2019.  The vessel has been chartered-in from its owner for a minimum period of three years with options to extend for up to two additional years, at Grindrod Shipping’s election.
  • In June 2019, we completed a financing arrangement with a Japanese shipowner relating to the 2010-built Handysize vessel IVS Knot for a cash amount of $13.0 million.  The transaction generated net proceeds of $6.3 million after settling the debt associated with the vessel.  The IVS Knot continues to be considered part of our owned fleet.
  • We wound up the Leopard Tankers JV with Vitol, resulting in the Company acquiring 100% ownership of the 2013-built Medium Range eco tankers Leopard Sun and Leopard Moon in January and February, respectively, for $27.0 million per vessel.
  • Our joint venture with Engen Petroleum sold the 2010-built Medium Range tanker Lavela for a gross price of $14.9 million with delivery to the buyers in March 2019.  The vessel was the last vessel owned by this joint venture.
  • We sold the 2011-built small product tanker Umgeni for a gross price of $8.9 million with delivery to the buyers in June 2019.

Latest Developments

  • We have agreed in principle to acquire the 33.25% stake of one of our two JV partners in IVS Bulk, which would result in increasing our ownership percentage to 66.75%.  We are currently in advanced discussions with lenders to refinance all of the existing debt of IVS Bulk, as well as provide us sufficient capital to acquire the additional 33.25% stake.  The remaining partner intends to retain its 33.25% stake in IVS Bulk.  We can provide no assurance that we will complete the acquisition until such time that agreements have been finalized and the financing has been obtained.
  • On August 8th, we took delivery of the IVS Okudogo, one of our two owned Ultramax eco new buildings built in Japan.  We finalized and drew down $15.7 million in financing with IYO Bank in conjunction with the delivery.  An additional $15.7 million remains available to partially finance the purchase of the IVS Prestwick, which is expected in late September.
  • Subject to documentation, we have agreed to enter into a financing arrangement with a Japanese shipowner on attractive terms relating to the 2011-built Handysize vessel IVS Kinglet.  The transaction would be on similar terms to the recently completed IVS Knot financing and would result in net cash proceeds of $6.3 million, after repayment of debt associated with the vessel. The transaction is expected to be completed in late September, though we can provide no assurances that the transaction will close.

CEO Commentary

Martyn Wade, the Chief Executive Officer of Grindrod Shipping, commented:

“Our operations in the first half of 2019 showed a slight improvement in revenue, gross profit, and Adjusted EBITDA with a slight decline in net income from the first half of 2018, reflecting weaker drybulk markets, partially offset by a stronger product tanker market.  Within that context, we continued to demonstrate our ability to outperform the relevant industry benchmarks in both our drybulk and tanker fleets. Specifically, for the first half of 2019, our TCE per day in the Handysize segment was $7,030 compared to the BHSI of $5,753 (adjusted for 5.0% commissions), an outperformance of approximately 22.2%, whereas in the Ultramax/Supramax segment our TCE per day was $10,481 compared to the BSI-58 of $7,807 (adjusted for 5.0% commissions), an outperformance of approximately 34.2%.  On the tanker side, the markets started strong in the winter months before coming off in the second half of the period as refinery maintenance season picked up, impacting charter rates. Still, we achieved an MR tanker TCE per day of $14,276 during the first half of 2019 compared to $12,448 for the Clarksons MR Clean Average Earnings assessment, an outperformance of approximately 14.7%.

The drybulk market in the first half of 2019 showed signs of weakness reflecting trade wars, the Vale dam disaster, swine flu in China impacting soybean imports, a general slowdown in Chinese imports, and other market disruptions.  Yet, we believe that the long-term fundamentals appear positive reflecting the reduced supply outlook combined with steady demand especially for minor bulks, which are typically carried by Grindrod Shipping’s vessels.  Already, we have experienced an increase in charter rates thus far in the second half, especially in the last few weeks, where the BHSI and BSI-58 have reached rates of $9,250 and $14,507, respectively, as of August 27, 2019. We also expect the product tanker market to improve given the increase in refining capacity and dislocation between refiners and end users combined with the low orderbook for MR tankers. Furthermore, the implementation of the IMO 2020 regulations may have a positive impact on the overall market further limiting supply as the result of higher scrapping rates, increased off hires, vessel repositioning, and slow steaming.

A core focus since our listing in June 2018 has been to streamline our corporate and financial structure by reducing the number of off-balance sheet joint ventures which will allow investors to more easily understand our operating and financial performance. To this end, we wound up our Leopard Tankers joint venture with Vitol and our Petrochemical Shipping joint venture with Engen Petroleum. We also agreed in principle to acquire the stake of one of our joint venture partners in IVS Bulk, which would allow us to consolidate its 12 vessels in our financials going forward.

We believe that the current drybulk and product tanker markets present attractive consolidation and growth opportunities and that Grindrod Shipping is well positioned to take advantage of them, leveraging our competitive advantages which include our modern, high quality Japanese built fleet, our ability to maximize revenue through the use of in-house commercial pools and cargoes, and our close commercial relationships with global and regional industry players.”   

Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

In comparison to the results for the first half of 2018, the results for the first half of 2019 were impacted by lower TCE per day rates achieved in our handysize and ultramax/supramax drybulk carrier segments, reflecting the weaker spot markets in these segments, and higher TCE per day rates achieved in our medium range and small tanker segments, reflecting the stronger spot markets in these segments. In all of these four segments vessel operating costs per day were lower for the first half of 2019 in comparison to the first half of 2018. Administrative expenses were lower in the first half of 2019 as compared to the first half of 2018, and the results for the first half of 2019 include the impairment of vessels and a foreign exchange loss, whereas the results for the first half of 2018 include a profit on sale of the OACL and Unicorn Bunker businesses and foreign exchange gains.

Revenue was $167.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $150.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Vessel revenue was $147.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $147.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

In the drybulk business, handysize total revenue and supramax/ultramax total revenue was $59.0 million and $72.0 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and $53.8 million and $73.7 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Handysize vessel revenue and supramax/ultramax vessel revenue was $50.2 million and $71.4 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and $53.0 million and $73.1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  

In the tankers business, our medium range tankers and small tankers total revenues were $27.6 million and $15.9 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and $18.9 million and $9.0 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Medium range tankers and small tankers vessel revenues were $20.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $18.9 million and $9.0 million, respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Handysize TCE per day was $7,030 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $8,997 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Supramax/ultramax TCE per day was to $10,481 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $11,092 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Medium range tankers TCE per day was $14,276 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $11,570 per day for the six ended June 30, 2018. Small tankers TCE per day was $12,015 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $11,323 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Cost of sales was $161.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $148.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. In the drybulk business, our handysize segment and supramax/ultramax segment cost of sales was $60.5 million and $72.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $50.6 million and $74.8 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Handysize voyage expenses and supramax/ultramax voyage expenses were $27.3 million and $37.1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $24.8 million and $35.3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Handysize vessel operating costs and supramax/ultramax vessel operating costs were $11.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and $13.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Handysize vessel operating costs per day were $4,980 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $5,238 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Supramax/ultramax vessel operating costs per day were $4,428 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $4,616 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

The long-term charter-in costs per day for our supramax/ultramax fleet was $12,695 per day during the first six months of 2019. During this period, out of 3,271 operating days in the supramax/ultramax segment, 44.8% were fulfilled with owned/long-term chartered-in vessels and the remaining 55.2% with short-term chartered-in vessels.

In the tankers business, medium range tankers and small tankers cost of sales were $24.5 million and $14.3 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $19.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Medium range tankers voyage expenses and small tankers voyage expenses were $3.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $3.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  Medium range tankers vessel operating costs and small tankers vessel operating costs were $5.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $5.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Medium range tankers vessel operating costs per day were $6,576 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $7,279 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  Small tankers vessel operating costs per day were $6,516 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $7,750 per day for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  

The long-term charter-in costs per day for our medium range tanker fleet was $15,298 per day during the first six months of 2019 and during this period all of the operating days in the medium range segment were fulfilled with owned/long-term chartered-in vessels. The Company did not have any long-term or short-term chartered-in small tankers during this period.

Gross profit was $5.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Other operating (expense) income was operating expense of $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $6.0 million operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Administrative expenses were $13.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $17.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Share of losses of joint ventures was a loss of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and a loss of $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Interest income was $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Interest expense was $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Income tax expense was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Loss for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $19.0 million and loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $13.5 million.

Cash used in operating activities was an outflow of $32.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and an outflow of $46.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Cash generated from investing activities was an inflow of $31.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and an inflow of $33.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Cash generated from financing activities was an inflow of $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and an inflow of $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

As of June 30, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) of $50.5 million.

Conference Call details

Tomorrow, Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time / 2:00 p.m. South African Standard Time / 8:00pm Singapore Time, the Company’s management will host a conference call and webcast to discuss the earnings results.

Conference Call details: Participants should dial into the call 10 minutes before the scheduled time using the following numbers: +1 866 966 1396 (US Toll Free Dial In), 0800 376 7922 (UK Toll Free Dial In), +800 852 6250 (Singapore Toll Free Dial In), 0800 014 553 (South Africa Toll Free Dial In), +44 (0)2071 928 000 (International Standard Dial In). Please enter code: 6092049.

An audio replay of the conference call will be available until Thursday, September 5, 2019, by dialing +1 866 331 1332 (US Toll Free Dial In), +44 (0)3333 009 785 (International Standard Dial In), +65 3158 3995 (Singapore Dial In), or 0800 014 706 (South Africa Toll Free Dial In). Access Code 6092049.

Audio Webcast - Slides Presentation

There will be an audio webcast of the conference call, accessible via the internet through the Grindrod Shipping website www.grinshipping.com. Participants to the live webcast should register on the website approximately 10 minutes prior to the start of the webcast.

The slide presentation of the financial results for the first half ended June 30, 2019 will be accessible in PDF format 10 minutes prior to the conference call and webcast on the Investor Relations section of our website located at www.grinshipping.com. Participants to the webcast can download the PDF presentation. The conference call will take participants through the slide presentation on the website.

About Grindrod Shipping Holdings Ltd.

Grindrod Shipping owns and operates a diversified fleet of owned and long-term and short-term chartered-in drybulk vessels and product tankers. The drybulk business, which operates under the brand “Island View Shipping” (“IVS”) includes a fleet of 17 handysize drybulk carriers and 14 supramax/ultramax drybulk carriers on the water, with three ultramax drybulk carriers under construction in Japan due be delivered in 2019 and 2020. The tanker business, which operates under the brand “Unicorn Shipping” (“Unicorn”) includes a fleet of seven medium range tankers and two small tankers. The Company is based in Singapore, with offices in London, Durban, Tokyo, Cape Town and Rotterdam. Grindrod Shipping is listed on NASDAQ under the ticker “GRIN” and on the JSE under the ticker “GSH”.

Fleet Table

The following table sets forth certain summary information regarding our fleet as of the date of this press release:

Drybulk Carriers — Owned Fleet (24 Vessels)

Vessel Name
Built
Country of
Build
DWT
Ownership
Percentage
Type of Employment
Handysize – Eco
 
 
 
 
 
IVS Tembe(3)
2016
Japan
37,740
33.5%
IVS Commercial(7)
IVS Sunbird(3)
2015
Japan
33,400
33.5%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Thanda(3)
2015
Japan
37,720
33.5%
IVS Commercial(7)
IVS Kestrel(3)
2014
Japan
32,770
33.5%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Phinda(3)
2014
Japan
37,720
33.5%
IVS Commercial(7)
IVS Sparrowhawk(3)
2014
Japan
33,420
33.5%
IVS Handysize Pool
Handysize
 
 
 
 
 
IVS Merlion
2013
China
32,070
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Raffles
2013
China
32,050
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Ibis
2012
Japan
28,240
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Kinglet(8)
2011
Japan
33,130
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Magpie
2011
Japan
28,240
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Orchard
2011
China
32,530
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Knot(6)(8)
2010
Japan
33,140
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Sentosa
2010
China
32,700
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Triview(1)
2009
Japan
32,280
51%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Kingbird
2007
Japan
32,560
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
IVS Nightjar
2004
Japan
32,320
100%
IVS Handysize Pool
Supramax/Ultramax – Eco
 
 
 
 
 
IVS Okudogo
2019
Japan
61,330
100%
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Swinley Forest(3)
2017
Japan
60,490
33.5%
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Gleneagles(3)
2016
Japan
58,070
33.5%
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS North Berwick(3)
2016
Japan
60,480
33.5%
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Bosch Hoek(3)
2015
Japan
60,270
33.5%
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Hirono(3)
2015
Japan
60,280
33.5%
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Wentworth(3)
2015
Japan
58,090
33.5%
IVS Supramax Pool


Drybulk Carriers — Long-Term Charter-In Fleet (7 Vessels)

Vessel Name
Built
Country of
Build
DWT
Charter-In
Period
Type of Employment
Supramax/Ultramax – Eco
 
 
 
 
 
IVS Phoenix
2019
Japan
61,470
2022-24(2)
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Hayakita(6)
2016
Japan
60,400
2023-26(2)
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Windsor
2016
Japan
60,280
2023-26(2)
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Augusta(6)
2015
Philippines(4)
57,800
2020-22(2)
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Pinehurst(6)
2015
Philippines(4)
57,810
2020-22(2)
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Crimson Creek
2014
Japan
57,950
2019-21(2)
IVS Supramax Pool
IVS Naruo(6)
2014
Japan
60,030
2021-24(2)
IVS Supramax Pool

Drybulk Carriers Under Construction — Owned Fleet (1 Vessel)

Vessel Name
Expected
Delivery
Country of
Build
DWT
Ownership
Percentage
Supramax/Ultramax – Eco
 
 
 
 
IVS Prestwick
September 2019
Japan
61,000
100%

Drybulk Carriers Under Construction — Long-Term Charter-In Fleet (2 Vessels)

Vessel Name
Expected
Delivery
Country of
Build
DWT
Charter-In
Period
Supramax/Ultramax – Eco
 
 
 
 
IVS Pebble Beach(6)
3Q 2020
Japan
62,000
2022-24(2)
IVS Atsugi(6)
3Q 2020
Japan
62,000
2022-24(2)


Tankers – Owned Fleet (7 Vessels)

Vessel Name
Built
Country of
Build
DWT
IMO
Designation
Ownership
Percentage
Type of Employment
Medium Range Tankers – Eco
Matuku
2016
South Korea
50,140
II,III
100%
Bareboat Charter (Expires 2020-22) (2)
Leopard Moon
2013
South Korea
50,000
III
100%
Vitol Commercial(5)
Leopard Sun
2013
South Korea
50,000
III
100%
Vitol Commercial(5)
Medium Range Tankers
Rhino
2010
South Korea
39,710
II, III
100%
Handy Tanker Pool
Inyala
2008
South Korea
40,040
III
100%
Handy Tanker Pool
Small Product Tankers
Kowie
2010
China
16,890
II, III
100%
Brostrom Tanker Pool
Breede
2009
China
16,900
II, III
100%
Spot Market and COA

Tankers – Long-Term Charter-In Fleet (2 Vessels)

Vessel Name
Built
Country of
Build
DWT
IMO
Designation
Charter-In
Period
Type of Employment
Medium Range Tankers – Eco
Doric Breeze
2013
South Korea
51,570
II, III
2Q 2020
Vitol Commercial(5)
Doric Pioneer
2013
South Korea
51,570
II, III
1Q 2020
Vitol Commercial(5)
  1. Owned through a joint venture with Mitsui & Co., Ltd. in which we have a 51% interest.
  2. Expiration date range represents the earliest and latest redelivery periods due to extension options.
  3. Owned through a joint venture with Regiment Capital Ltd. and Sankaty European Investments III, S.à.r.l. in which we have a 33.5% interest.
  4. Constructed at Tsuneishi Cebu Shipyard, a subsidiary of Tsuneishi Shipbuilding of Japan.
  5. Our eco product tankers, other than Matuku, are commercially managed by Mansel Pte. Ltd. Mansel, an affiliate of Vitol, procures shipping for various oil cargoes traded by Vitol.
  6. Includes purchase options for Grindrod Shipping. For IVS Augusta and IVS Pinehurst, Grindrod Shipping has the option to purchase either, but not both, of these vessels of its choice.
  7. Commercially managed by Grindrod Shipping alongside the IVS Handysize Pool.
  8. IVS Knot has undergone a financing arrangement in which we sold the vessel but retained the right to control the use of the vessel for a period up to 2030, and we have an option to acquire the vessel commencing in 2021. We regard the vessel as owned since we have retained the right to control the use of the vessel. We expect to enter into a similar arrangement in respect of IVS Kinglet in September 2019 that would result in net cash proceeds of $6.3 million, after repayment of debt associated with IVS Kinglet, though we can provide no assurances that this transaction will be concluded.

Segment Results of Operations(1)

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Drybulk Carriers Business
 
 
 
 
 
Handysize Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
 
58,983
 
$
 
53,828
 
Cost of sales
$
(60,479
)
$
(50,601
)
Supramax/Ultramax Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
 
71,963
 
$
 
73,675
 
Cost of sales
$
(72,569
)
$
(74,755
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tanker Business
 
 
 
 
 
Medium Range Tanker Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
 
27,647
 
$
 
18,921
 
Cost of sales
$
(24,510
)
$
(19,709
)
Small Tanker Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
 
15,917
 
$
 
8,966
 
Cost of sales
$
(14,284
)
$
(8,378
)
___________________________________
  1. Segment results of operations include the impact of the proportionate share of joint ventures, which differs from the statements of profit or loss in our unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements which account for our investments in joint ventures under the equity method.


Selected Historical and Statistical Data of Our Operating Fleet

Set forth below are selected historical and statistical data of our operating fleet for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 that we believe may be useful in better understanding our operating fleet’s financial position and results of operations(1). This table contains certain information regarding TCE per day, vessel operating costs per day and long-term charter-in costs per day which are non-GAAP measures. For a discussion and reconciliation of certain of these measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” at the end of this press release.

 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
2019
 
2018
 


Drybulk Carriers Business

 
 
 
 
 
Handysize Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Calendar days(2)
 
3,306
 
3,293
 
Available days(3)
 
3,285
 
3,183
 
Operating days(4)
 
3,262
 
3,129
 
Owned fleet operating days(5)
 
2,341
 
2,339
 
Long-term charter-in days(6)
 
-
 
181
 
Short-term charter-in days(7)
 
921
 
609
 
Fleet utilization(8)
 
99.3
%
98.3
%
TCE per day(9)
 
$
7,030
 
$
8,997
 
Vessel operating costs per day(10)
 
$
4,980
 
$
5,238
 
Long-term charter-in costs per day(11)
 
$
-
 
$
8,600
 
Supramax/Ultramax Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Calendar days(2)
 
3,285
 
3,471
 
Available days(3)
 
3,280
 
3,423
 
Operating days(4)
 
3,271
 
3,402
 
Owned fleet operating days(5)
 
358
 
343
 
Long-term charter-in days(6)
 
1,106
 
1,196
 
Short-term charter-in days(7)
 
1,807
 
1,863
 
Fleet utilization(8)
 
99.7
%
99.4
%
TCE per day(9)
 
$
10,481
 
$
11,092
 
Vessel operating costs per day(10)
 
$
4,428
 
$
4,616
 
Long-term charter-in costs per day(11)
 
$
12,695
 
$
13,049
 




Tankers Business

 
 
 
 
 
Medium Range Tankers Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Calendar days(2)
 
1,149
 
1,358
 
Available days(3)
 
1,149
 
1,346
 
Operating days(4)
 
1,149
 
1,311
 
Owned fleet operating days(5)
 
787
 
779
 
Long-term charter-in days(6)
 
362
 
532
 
Short-term charter-in days(7)
 
-
 
-
 
Fleet utilization(8)
 
100
%
97.4
%
TCE per day(9)
 
$
14,276
 
$
11,570
 
Vessel operating costs per day(10)
 
$
6,576
 
$
7,279
 
Long-term charter-in costs per day(11)
 
$
15,298
 
$
15,031
 
Small Tanker Segment
 
 
 
 
 
Calendar days(2)
 
541
 
634
 
Available days(3)
 
529
 
610
 
Operating days(4)
 
529
 
600
 
Owned fleet operating days(5)
 
529
 
600
 
Long-term charter-in days(6)
 
-
 
-
 
Short-term charter-in days(7)
 
-
 
-
 
Fleet utilization(8)
 
100
%
98.4
%
TCE per day(9)
 
$
12,015
 
$
11,323
 
Vessel operating costs per day(10)
 
$
6,516
 
$
7,750
 
Long-term charter-in costs per day(11)
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
___________________________________________
  1. Segment results of operations include the proportionate share of joint ventures, which differs from the statements of profit or loss in our unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements which account for our investments in joint ventures under the equity method.
  2. Calendar days: total calendar days the vessels were in our possession for the relevant period.
  3. Available days: total number of calendar days a vessel is in our possession for the relevant period after subtracting off-hire days for scheduled drydocking and special surveys. We use available days to measure the number of days in a relevant period during which vessels should be available for generating revenue.
  4. Operating days: the number of available days in the relevant period a vessel is controlled by us after subtracting the aggregate number of days that the vessel is off-hire due to a reason other than scheduled drydocking and special surveys, including unforeseen circumstances. We use operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in a relevant period during which vessels are actually available to generate revenue.
  5. Owned fleet operating days: the number of operating days in which our owned fleet is operating for the relevant period.
  6. Long-term charter-in days: the number of operating days in which our long-term charter-in fleet is operating for the relevant period. We regard chartered-in vessels as long-term charters if the period of the charter we initially commit to is 12 months or more. Once we have included such chartered-in vessels in our fleet, we will continue to regard them as part of our fleet until the end of their chartered-in period, including any period that the charter has been extended under an option, even if at a given time the remaining period of their charter may be less than 12 months.
  7. Short-term charter-in days: the number of operating days for which we have chartered-in third party vessels for durations of less than one year for the relevant period.
  8. Fleet utilization: the percentage of time that vessels are available for generating revenue, determined by dividing the number of operating days during a relevant period by the number of available days during that period. We use fleet utilization to measure a company’s efficiency in technically managing its vessels.
  9. TCE per day: vessel revenue less voyage expenses during a relevant period divided by the number of operating days during the period. The number of operating days used to calculate TCE revenue per day includes the proportionate share of our joint ventures’ operating days and includes charter-in days. Please see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for a discussion of TCE revenue and a reconciliation of TCE revenue to revenue.
  10. Vessel operating costs per day: vessel operating costs per day represents vessel operating costs divided by the number of calendar days for owned vessels. The vessel operating costs and the number of calendar days used to calculate vessel operating costs per day includes the proportionate share of our joint ventures’ vessel operating costs and calendar days and excludes charter-in costs and charter-in days. Please see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for a discussion of vessel operating costs per day.
  11. Long-term charter-in costs per day: charter costs relating to long-term chartered-in vessels divided by long-term charter-in days for the relevant period. Please see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for a discussion of long-term charter-in costs and its reconciliation to charter hire costs.

    The average long-term charter-in costs per day for the Supramax/ultramax fleet for the second half of 2019 is expected to be approximately $12,735/day. The average long term charter-in costs per day for the medium range tanker fleet for the second half of 2019 is expected to be approximately $15,300/day.


Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statement of Financial Position

 
 
June 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
US
 
US
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and bank balances
 
37,855
 
35,636
Trade receivables
 
9,986
 
12,034
Contract assets
 
3,590
 
1,959
Other receivables and prepayments
 
18,227
 
17,902
Due from related parties
 
8,222
 
13,516
Loans to joint ventures
 
5,469
 
23,803
Derivative financial instruments
 
115
 
-
Inventories
 
8,605
 
10,841
 
 
92,069
 
115,691
Assets classified as held for sale
 
612
 
7,258
Total current assets
 
92,681
 
122,949
 
 
 
 
 
Non-current assets
 
 
 
 
Restricted cash
 
12,674
 
11,627
Ships, property, plant and equipment
 
287,505
 
249,602
Right of use assets
 
67,859
 
-
Interest in joint ventures
 
52,135
 
54,560
Intangible assets
 
132
 
41
Goodwill
 
7,448
 
7,351
Deferred tax assets
 
1,496
 
1,497
Total non-current assets
 
429,249
 
324,678
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
521,930
 
447,627
 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Trade and other payables
 
27,156
 
22,364
Bank loans and other borrowings
 
18,951
 
18,323
Lease liabilities
 
27,169
 
-
Due to related parties
 
7,277
 
6,238
Income tax payable
 
3,499
 
3,073
Derivative financial instruments
 
9
 
867
Provisions
 
961
 
1,578
Contract liabilities
 
3,639
 
4,223
Total current liabilities
 
88,661
 
56,666


Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statement of Financial Position (cont’d)

 
 
June 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
US
 
US
Non-current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Bank loans and other borrowings
 
113,505
 
 
96,133
 
Lease liabilities
 
40,743
 
 
-
 
Trade and other payables
 
398
 
 
403
 
Retirement benefit obligation
 
1,880
 
 
1,922
 
Total non-current liabilities
 
156,526
 
 
98,458
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital and reserves
 
 
 
 
Share capital
 
320,683
 
 
320,683
 
Other reserves
 
(17,946
)
 
(21,140
)
Accumulated losses
 
(25,994
)
 
(7,040
)
Total equity
 
276,743
 
 
292,503
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total equity and liabilities
 
521,930
 
 
447,627
 



Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statement of Profit or Loss

For the six-month period ended June 30
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
US
 
US
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
 
167,220
 
 
150,841
 
Cost of sales
 
 
 
 
Voyage expenses
 
(74,382
)
 
(71,513
)
Vessel operating costs
 
(16,749
)
 
(16,344
)
Charter hire costs
 
(30,749
)
 
(54,280
)
Depreciation and amortisation – owned assets
 
(8,496
)
 
(6,649
)
Depreciation – right of use assets
 
(13,821
)
 
-
 
Other expenses
 
(352
)
 
354
 
Cost of ship sale
 
(16,739
)
 
-
 
Gross profit
 
5,932
 
 
2,409
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other operating (expense) income
 
(4,802
)
 
5,965
 
Administrative expenses
 
(13,313
)
 
(17,292
)
Share of losses of joint ventures
 
(1,538
)
 
(1,372
)
Interest income
 
1,215
 
 
1,945
 
Interest expense
 
(5,815
)
 
(2,961
)
Loss before taxation
 
(18,321
)
 
(11,306
)
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax expense
 
(633
)
 
(2,147
)
Loss for the period
 
(18,954
)
 
(13,453
)
 
 
 
 
 
Loss per share:
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted, loss for the period attributable to ordinary equity holders of the company (per share figures in U.S. dollars)
 
 (0.99
)
 
 (0.71
)
Per share figures based on 19,063,833 ordinary shares
 
 
 
 


Unudited Summary Statement of Cash Flows

The following table presents cash flow information for each of the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:

 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
2019
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash used in operating activities
 
$
(32,443
)
$
(46,246
)
Cash generated from investing activities
 
31,171
 
33,215
 
Cash generated from financing activities
 
2,770
 
19,450
 
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
1,498
 
6,419
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
 
33,498
 
45,245
 
Differences in translation
 
125
 
(1,269
)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
35,121
 
50,395
 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The financial information included in this press release includes certain “non-GAAP financial measures” as such term is defined in SEC regulations governing the use of non-GAAP financial measures. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s operating performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are included in, or excluded from, the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with IFRS. For example, non-GAAP financial measures may exclude the impact of certain unique and/or non-operating items such as acquisitions, divestitures, restructuring charges, large write-offs or items outside of management’s control. Management believes that the non-GAAP financial measures described below provide investors and analysts useful insight into our financial position and operating performance.

TCE Revenue and TCE per day.  

TCE revenue is defined as vessel revenue less voyage expenses. Such TCE revenue, divided by the number of our operating days during the period, is TCE per day. Vessel revenue and voyage expenses as reported for our operating segments include a proportionate share of vessel revenue and voyage expenses attributable to our joint ventures based on our proportionate ownership of the joint ventures for the period the joint venture existed during the relevant period. The number of operating days used to calculate TCE per day also includes the proportionate share of our joint ventures’ operating days for the period the joint venture existed during the relevant period and also includes charter-in days.

TCE per day is a common shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare daily earnings generated by vessels on time charters with daily earnings generated by vessels on voyage charters, because charter hire rates for vessels on voyage charters have to cover voyage expenses and are generally not expressed in per-day amounts while charter hire rates for vessels on time charters do not cover voyage expenses and generally are expressed in per day amounts.

Below is a reconciliation from TCE revenue to revenue:

 
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Revenue
 
Voyage
Expenses
 
TCE
Revenue
 
Revenue
 
Voyage
Expenses
 
TCE
Revenue
 
Vessel Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Handysize
 
50,228
 
 
(27,296
)
 
22,932
 
52,955
 
(24,805
)
28,150
 
Supramax/ultramax
 
71,401
 
 
(37,118
)
 
34,283
 
73,082
 
(35,344
)
37,738
 
Medium Range Tankers
 
20,294
 
 
(3,891
)
 
16,403
 
18,946
 
(3,773
)
15,173
 
Small Tankers
 
7,437
 
 
(1,081
)
 
6,356
 
8,966
 
(2,169
)
6,797
 
Other drybulk carriers
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,215
 
 
 
 
 
Other tankers
 
2,569
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,570
 
 
 
 
 
Other revenue
 
19,542
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,424
 
 
 
 
 
Adjustments*
 
(4,251
)
 
 
 
 
 
(10,317
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
 
167,220
 
 
 
 
 
 
150,841
 
 
 
 
 
______________________________
  • Vessel revenue earned and voyage expenses incurred by the joint ventures are included within the operating segment information on a proportionate consolidation basis.  Accordingly, joint ventures’ proportionate financial information are adjusted out to reconcile to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.

Vessel operating costs per day.

Vessel operating costs per day represents vessel operating costs divided by the number of calendar days for owned vessels during the period. The vessel operating costs and the number of calendar days used to calculate vessel operating costs per day includes the proportionate share of our joint ventures’ vessel operating costs and operating days for the period the joint venture existed during the relevant period and excludes charter-in costs and charter-in days.

Vessel operating costs per day is a non-GAAP performance measure commonly used in the shipping industry to provide an understanding of the daily technical management costs relating to the running of owned vessels.

Long-term charter-in costs and Long-term charter-in costs per day

Long-term charter-in costs is defined as the charter costs relating to chartered-in vessels included in our Fleet from time to time, which are vessels for which the period of the charter that we initially commit to is 12 months or more, even if at a given time the remaining period of their charter may be less than 12 months (“long-term charter-in vessels”).  Such long-term charter-in costs, divided by the number of operating days for the relevant vessels during the period, is long-term charter-in costs per day.

Before the application of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, long-term charter-in costs were included in charter hire costs in the statement of profit and loss. From January 1, 2019, charter hire costs in the statement of profit and loss only includes charter costs that meet the definition of short-term leases in terms of IFRS 16 which, due to practical expedients allowed under IFRS 16, for the period from  January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 includes charter costs relating to some but not all of our long-term charter-in vessels, with the charter costs relating to the remainder of our long-term charter-in vessels presented as lease payments on ships.  Accordingly, charter hire costs and lease payments on ships together comprise “adjusted charter hire costs”.

Long-term charter-in costs and long-term charter-in costs per day are non-GAAP performance measures used primarily to provide an understanding of the total costs and total costs per day relating to the charter-in of the company’s long-term chartered-in vessels.

Below is a reconciliation from long-term charter-in costs to adjusted charter hire costs.

 
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Charter hire
costs
 
Lease
payments
on Ships
 
Adjusted
charter hire
costs
 
Long-term
charter-in
costs
 
Short-
term
charter-in
costs
 
Adjusted
charter
hire costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Handysize
 
7,153
 
 
-
 
7,153
 
 
-
 
7,153
 
7,153
 
 
Supramax/ultramax
 
21,329
 
 
11,938
 
33,267
 
 
14,041
 
19,226
 
33,267
 
 
Medium Range Tankers
 
2,769
 
 
2,769
 
5,538
 
 
5,538
 
-
 
5,538
 
 
Small Tankers
 
-
 
 
-
 
-
 
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
 
Others
 
-
 
 
-
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
-
 
 
Adjustments(*)
 
(502
)
 
-
 
(502
)
 
 
 
 
 
(502
)
 
 
 
30,749
 
 
14,707
 
45,456
 
 
 
 
 
 
45,456
 
 


 
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Charter hire
costs
 
Lease
payments
on Ships
 
Adjusted
charter hire
costs
 
Long-term
charter-in
costs
 
Short-
term
charter-in
costs
 
Adjusted
charter
hire costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Handysize
 
8,418
 
 
-
 
8,418
 
 
1,556
 
6,862
 
8,418
 
 
Supramax/ultramax
 
36,680
 
 
-
 
36,680
 
 
15,607
 
21,073
 
36,680
 
 
Medium Range Tankers
 
7,990
 
 
-
 
7,990
 
 
7,990
 
-
 
7,990
 
 
Small Tankers
 
-
 
 
-
 
-
 
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
 
Others
 
1,468
 
 
-
 
1,468
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,468
 
 
Adjustments(*)
 
(276
)
 
-
 
(276
)
 
 
 
 
 
(276
)
 
 
 
54,280
 
 
-
 
54,280
 
 
 
 
 
 
54,280
 
 
_________________________________
  • Charter hire, Lease payments on Ships, Long-term charter-in costs and Short-term charter-in costs incurred by the joint ventures are included within the operating segment information on a proportionate consolidation basis.  Accordingly, joint ventures’ proportionate financial information are adjusted out to reconcile to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated and combined financial statements.


EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.  

EBITDA is defined as earnings before income tax expense or credit, interest income, interest expense, share of (profit)/loss of joint ventures and depreciation and amortization. For periods commencing January 1, 2019, interest expense and depreciation and amortization include amounts relating to leases and classified, as appropriate, as interest expense or depreciation – right of use assets under the application of IFRS 16. Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted to exclude the items set forth in the table below, which represent certain non-recurring, non-operating or other items that we believe are not indicative of the ongoing performance of our core operations.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used by analysts in the shipping industry as common performance measures to compare results across peers. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not items recognized by IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or used as alternatives to loss for the period or any other indicator of our operating performance.

Our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is intended to supplement investors’ understanding of our operating performance by providing information regarding our ongoing performance that exclude items we believe do not directly affect our core operations and enhancing the comparability of our ongoing performance across periods. Our management considers EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to be useful to investors because such performance measures provide information regarding the profitability of our core operations and facilitate comparison of our operating performance to the operating performance of our peers. Additionally, our management uses EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as measures when reviewing our operating performance. While we believe these measures are useful to investors, the definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA used by us may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.

The table below presents the reconciliation between loss for the period to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and June, 30 2018:

 
 
Six Months ended

June 30,
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss for the period
$
 
(18,954
)
$
 
(13,453
)
Adjusted for:
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax expense
 
633
 
 
2,147
 
Interest income
 
(1,215
)
 
(1,945
)
Interest expense
 
5,815
 
 
2,961
 
Share of losses of joint ventures
 
1,538
 
 
1,372
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
22,610
 
 
6,763
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA
$
10,427
 
$
(2,155
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted for
 
 
 
 
 
Listing costs
 
 
-
 
 
 
4,079
 
Impairment loss on ships
 
 
4,304
 
 
 
-
 
Gain on disposals of businesses
 
-
 
 
(3,255
)
Gain on deemed disposal of previously held joint venture
 
-
 
 
(324
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
ADJUSTED EBITDA
$
14,731
 
$
(1,655
)

Headline Loss.    

The Johannesburg Stock Exchange, or JSE, requires that we calculate and publicly disclose Headline Loss Per Share and Diluted Headline Loss Per Share. Headline Loss Per Share is calculated using net income which has been determined based on IFRS. Accordingly, this may differ from the Headline Loss Per Share calculation of other companies listed on the JSE because such companies may report their financial results under a different financial reporting framework such as U.S. GAAP.

Headline Loss for the period represents Loss for the period adjusted for the re-measurements that are more closely aligned to the operating or trading results as set forth below, and Headline Loss Per Share represents this figure divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the period.


The table below presents a reconciliation between Loss for the period to Headline Loss for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and June, 30 2018.

 
 
Six Months ended June 30,
 
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, other than per share data)
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Reconciliation between loss for the period and headline loss:
 
 
 
 
 
Loss for the period
$
 
(18,954
)
$
 
(13,453
)
Adjusted for:
 
 
 
 
 
- Impairment loss on joint venture’s ship
 
-
 
 
1,423
 
- Impairment loss on ships
 
4,304
 
 
-
 
- Loss (Gain) on disposals of plant and equipment
 
193
 
 
(63
)
- Gain on disposals of businesses
 
-
 
 
(3,255
)
- Gain on deemed disposal of previously held joint venture
 
-
 
 
(324
)
- Capital gains tax on sale of businesses
 
-
 
 
1,809
 
Headline Loss
$
(14,457
)
$
(13,863
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of shares on which the per share figures have been calculated
 
19,063,833
 
 
19,063,833
 
Basic and diluted loss per share
$
 
(0.99
)
$
 
(0.71
)
Basic and diluted headline loss per share
$
 
(0.76
)
$
 
(0.73
)


IFRS 16

The “Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated and Combined Statement of Profit or Loss” and “Unaudited Summary Statement of Cash Flows” sections in this press release reflects the adoption of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. Under this approach, comparative information is not restated. We have presented below, the amounts by which each financial statement line item is affected in the current reporting period by the application of IFRS 16 as compared to IAS 17 Leases (“IAS 17”) that was in effect before the change.

Our management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide comparability of the financial results and cash flow position that was reported for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and also believes that these non-GAAP measures provide investors the ability to better understand the results from the primary operation of our business in 2019 compared with 2018. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be used as a substitute for, or considered superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.


Impact of IFRS 16 on the Statement of Profit or Loss for the six months ended June 30, 2019

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
Under
previous
IFRS
 
Adoption of
IFRS 16 (i)
 
Under new
IFRS
Cost of sales
 
 
 
 
 
Charter hire costs
$
(45,453
)
 
$
14,704
 
 
$
(30,749
)
Vessel operating costs
 
(16,820
)
 
 
71
 
 
 
(16,749
)
Depreciation – right of use assets
 
-
 
 
 
(13,821
)
 
 
(13,821
)
Administrative expenses
 
(13,320
)
 
 
7
 
 
 
(13,313
)
Interest expense
 
(4,073
)
 
 
(1,742
)
 
 
(5,815
)


Impact of IFRS 16 on the Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
Under
previous
IFRS
 
Adoption of
IFRS 16 (ii)
 
Under new
IFRS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash used in operating activities
(45,687)
 
13,244
 
(32,443)
Cash generated from financing activities
16,014
 
(13,244)
 
2,770

(i) The standard requires the change in the amount and presentation of expenses related to leases formerly recorded as operating leases. Operating leases were previously recorded as “Charter hire costs” for ships, “Vessel operating costs” for ship equipment and “Administrative expenses” for property. When applying IFRS 16, the expense is split into “Interest expense” and “Depreciation – right of use assets”.  Expenses relating to short-term leases and low value leases will continue to be expensed and disclosed in line with the previous treatment.

(ii) Payments of operating leases were previously presented as part of net cash flows used in operating activities.  Under IFRS 16, the cash payments under the leases will be split between cash payments for the interest portion of the lease liability and cash payments for the principal portion. Payments for the principal portion will be presented in the financing activities and payments for the interest portion will remain in the operating activities.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 1995 with respect to Grindrod Shipping’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, business strategies, operating efficiencies, competitive position, growth opportunities, plans and objectives of management, and other matters. These forward looking statements, including, among others, those relating to our future business prospects, revenues and income, are necessarily estimates and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements should be considered in light of various important factors, including those set forth below. Words such as “may,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “hopes,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the information available to, and the expectations and assumptions deemed reasonable by Grindrod Shipping at the time these statements were made. Although Grindrod Shipping believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of Grindrod Shipping. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, Grindrod Shipping’s future operating or financial results; the strength of world economies, including, in particular, in China and the rest of the Asia-Pacific region; cyclicality of the drybulk and tanker markets, including general drybulk and tanker shipping market conditions and trends, including fluctuations in charter hire rates and vessel values; changes in supply and demand in the drybulk and tanker shipping industries, including the market for Grindrod Shipping’s vessels; changes in the value of Grindrod Shipping’s vessels; changes in Grindrod Shipping’s business strategy and expected capital spending or operating expenses, including drydocking, surveys, upgrades and insurance costs; competition within the drybulk and tanker industries; seasonal fluctuations within the drybulk and tanker industries; Grindrod Shipping’s ability to employ its vessels in the spot market and its ability to enter into time charters after its current charters expire; general economic conditions and conditions in the oil and coal industries; Grindrod Shipping’s ability to satisfy the technical, health, safety and compliance standards of its customers, especially major oil companies and oil producers; the failure of counterparties to our contracts to fully perform their obligations with Grindrod Shipping; Grindrod Shipping’s ability to execute its growth strategy; international political and economic conditions including additional tariffs imposed by China and the United States; potential disruption of shipping routes due to weather, accidents, political events, natural disasters or other catastrophic events; vessel breakdowns; corruption, piracy, military conflicts, political instability and terrorism in locations where we may operate; fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates and the uncertainty surrounding the continued existence of the London Interbank Offered Rate; changes in the costs associated with owning and operating Grindrod Shipping’s vessels; changes in, and Grindrod Shipping’s compliance with, governmental, tax, environmental, health and safety regulations including the International Maritime Organization, or IMO 2020, regulations limiting sulfur content in fuels; potential liability from pending or future litigation; Grindrod Shipping’s ability to procure or have access to financing, its liquidity and the adequacy of cash flows for its operation; the continued borrowing availability under Grindrod Shipping’s debt agreements and compliance with the covenants contained therein; Grindrod Shipping’s ability to fund future capital expenditures and investments in the construction, acquisition and refurbishment of its vessels; Grindrod Shipping’s dependence on key personnel; Grindrod Shipping’s expectations regarding the availability of vessel acquisitions and its ability to buy and sell vessels and to charter-in vessels as planned or at prices we deem satisfactory; adequacy of Grindrod Shipping’s insurance coverage; effects of new technological innovation and advances in vessel design; Grindrod Shipping’s ability to realize the benefits of the separation from Grindrod Limited;Grindrod Shipping’s ability to operate as an independent entity; and the other factors set out in “Item 3.  Key Information-Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Grindrod Shipping undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by law.

Company Contact:
Martyn Wade / Stephen Griffiths
CEO / CFO
Grindrod Shipping Holdings Ltd.
200 Cantonment Road, #03-01 Southpoint
Singapore, 089763
Email: ir@grindrodshipping.com
Website: www.grinshipping.com
Investor Relations / Media Contact:
Nicolas Bornozis / Judit Csepregi
Capital Link, Inc.
230 Park Avenue, Suite 1536
New York, N.Y. 10169
Tel.: (212) 661-7566
Fax: (212) 661-7526
Email: grindrod@capitallink.com

 

Stock Information

Company Name: Grindrod Shipping Holdings Ltd.
Stock Symbol: GRIN
Market: NASDAQ
Website: grinshipping.com

Menu

GRIN GRIN Quote GRIN Short GRIN News GRIN Articles GRIN Message Board
Get GRIN Alerts

News, Short Squeeze, Breakout and More Instantly...