2023-08-14 22:41:00 ET
Summary
- According to the TINA concept, stocks are to be purchased when There Is No Alternative, which is shorthand for something like “buy stocks because bond yields stink.”.
- Using an amalgamation of Japan’s PPI, along with the PPIs of its major trade partners, there appears to be a gravitational pull in consumer price inflation in the next quarter or two.
- In contrast, most of the last generation saw Japan’s stock-versus-bond math flip the other way around from the situation in the U.S.
By Jeff Weniger, CFA
One of the main reasons the MSCI Japan Index has rallied by 14% in 2023 is the country’s status as the last remaining “TINA” holdout. According to the TINA concept, stocks are to be purchased when T here I s N o A lternative, which is shorthand for something like “buy stocks because bond yields stink.” But if government bonds are throwing off 3% or 4% yields, as is now the case in the U.S., Canada and most of Europe, suddenly stocks don’t look as enticing as they did a few years back when many of those bonds were in negative yield territory.
Until recently, the 10-year Japanese government bond (JGB) was bopping around at levels south of 0.50%, the upper boundary of the Bank of Japan’s (BoJ’s) +/-50 basis points (bps) window around a 0% target. While the vibe is that the benchmark JGB was itching to explode through 0.50%, with only the BoJ preventing it, I want to take great pains to point out that it wasn’t like the 10-year was spending most of this year at 0.49% or 0.50%. To the contrary, for large chunks of this year you could pull a yield quote and it would be in the low-40s. That fact seems lost on many observers, who seem to have it in their mind that the selling impulse on JGBs was at some boiling point.
There was pressure, no doubt, but I’m not sure it was as bold as commonly believed. Granted, the 50-bps band was a bit new; for several years, the yield curve was considered to be in control so long as bond yields never hopped outside of -0.25% or +0.25%.
Nevertheless, with global bond markets all over the place in the last couple years—and by “all over the place,” I mean being sold—the BoJ was put into a tough bind as rates jumped in the other six members of the G7. A few weeks ago, the BoJ got cornered and made the decision that was being whispered loudly for a while before it happened—to let 0.50% get pierced to the upside (figure 1). The new terminology: 0.50% is a “reference rate,” a guidepost, not a line in the sand.
Up through 0.50% the JGB yield went. You can see the little pop at the end of figure 1.
Figure 1: 10-year Japanese government bond yield (%)
The BoJ is going to get lucky, I believe, and it’s not from any genius policy moves or anything like that. It’s a right place at the right time situation. So many global PPIs are tumbling, ostensibly as the global economy deteriorates.
I have reason to believe that we have seen the peak in Japan’s Core CPI, at least as far as 2023 and early 2024 are concerned. Using an amalgamation of Japan’s PPI, along with the PPIs of its major trade partners, there appears to be a gravitational pull in consumer price inflation in the next quarter or two. I will not be stunned in the slightest if the coveted 2% inflation target gets breached to the downside (figure 2).
Figure 2: Japan’s Core CPI has downside risk
As far as TINA is concerned, figure 3 shows why this yield backup only matters around the edges.
Consider, for one, the death of TINA in the U.S.
The last generation or so, which I’ll date to the Global Financial Crisis, has witnessed the S&P 500’s dividend yield clocking in sometimes higher, sometimes lower than the 10-Year U.S. T-Note yield. The bond market bear, which celebrated a second birthday the other day, changed that situation notably; the Treasury yield has popped to around 4%, while the ruthlessly rallying S&P’s dividend yield has withered to 1.50%. It makes you think a little when your head hits the pillow and you’re in an 80/20 or a 70/30, with most of that equity in U.S. stocks.
In contrast, most of the last generation saw Japan’s stock-versus-bond math flip the other way around from the situation in the U.S. While TINA died for the S&P 500, in Japan it’s as strong as ever. If I have this right and the BoJ feels compelled to stop the bond market at something like 1% yields—or JGBs don’t even get there, then an overweight allocation in TINA-based Japan looks like a solid argument.
Figure 3: TINA no vs. TINA yes
Jeff Weniger, CFA serves as Head of Equity Strategy at WisdomTree. In his role, Weniger helps to formulate the firm’s stock market outlook by assessing macro and fundamental trends. Prior to joining WisdomTree, he was Director, Senior Strategist at BMO, where he worked in the office of the CIO from 2006 to 2017. He served on the firm’s Asset Allocation Committee and co-managed the firm’s ETF model portfolios for both the U.S. and Canada. In 2013, at the age of 32, Jeff was chosen as the youngest member of BMO’s Global Investment Forum, which collected the firm’s top global strategists to formulate the firm’s official long-term outlook for investment trends and markets. Jeff has a B.S. in Finance from the University of Florida and an MBA from Notre Dame. He has been a CFA charterholder and a member of the CFA Society of Chicago since 2006. He has appeared in various financial publications such as Barron’s and the Wall Street Journal and makes regular appearances on Canada’s Business News Network (BNN) and Wharton Business Radio.
There are risks involved with investing, including possible loss of principal. Foreign investing involves currency, political and economic risk. Funds focusing on a single country, sector and/or funds that emphasize investments in smaller companies may experience greater price volatility. Investments in emerging markets, currency, fixed income and alternative investments include additional risks. Please see prospectus for discussion of risks.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material contains the opinions of the author, which are subject to change, and should not to be considered or interpreted as a recommendation to participate in any particular trading strategy, or deemed to be an offer or sale of any investment product and it should not be relied on as such. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will work under all market conditions. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events or a guarantee of future results. This material should not be relied upon as research or investment advice regarding any security in particular. The user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of the information provided herein. Neither WisdomTree nor its affiliates, nor Foreside Fund Services, LLC, or its affiliates provide tax or legal advice. Investors seeking tax or legal advice should consult their tax or legal advisor. Unless expressly stated otherwise the opinions, interpretations or findings expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of WisdomTree or any of its affiliates.
The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-disseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or component of any financial instruments or products or indexes. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each entity involved in compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the “MSCI Parties”) expressly disclaims all warranties. With respect to this information, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including loss profits) or any other damages (www.msci.com)
Editor's Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
For further details see:
Loosening YCC Will Not Stop Japanese Stocks' TINA Appeal