Unfortunately, there aren't any federal laws limiting the |
@Kr0nx |
06/15/2006 2:54:06 PM |
Guess they decided they couldnt find anymore lambs |
@Int_Fin_Investor |
06/15/2006 1:12:58 AM |
Reverse split time again ==> 1-1000 r/s effective tomorrow |
@Ryguy |
06/14/2006 8:27:05 PM |
PCCE.OB - Hey guys. Saw my name on |
@tmaxx |
06/14/2006 1:30:15 PM |
Here's a docket summary of the civil case |
@dipak |
02/03/2006 11:12:31 PM |
The feds filed two lawsuits - one criminal |
@EliteFarts007 |
02/03/2006 10:59:03 PM |
I don't know. Perhaps he couldn't find |
@cls123 |
02/03/2006 10:49:58 PM |
WHAT WAS THE OUTCOME OF THE TRIAL? |
@hcmchetu |
02/01/2006 6:00:08 PM |
Pacel Corp Now PCCE.ob |
@DBWA48 |
02/01/2006 5:57:33 PM |
Q: What did Ryan Schadel ever find out? |
@vikassingh55 |
02/01/2006 5:47:55 PM |
1-1000 r/s effective Monday |
@dmtoolbox |
06/17/2005 8:19:34 PM |
How did things turn out for you here |
@RightOn |
05/01/2005 7:04:02 PM |
|
@markdwane |
04/04/2005 5:33:35 AM |
I'm out as of yesterday, after I sold |
@dmtoolbox |
03/08/2005 6:57:57 PM |
I'm out! |
@FloridaJim1 |
03/08/2005 6:49:56 PM |
awake - |
@Aleksei |
03/07/2005 11:13:29 PM |
It is available at the company why else |
@bennykoo |
03/07/2005 8:40:26 PM |
You're posting o/s and a/s. I asked |
@ranjan |
03/07/2005 6:40:16 PM |
Authorized Shares: 10,000,000 |
@ThaDocsN |
03/07/2005 4:09:41 PM |
Please post the total number of open short |
@casperchristiansen |
03/06/2005 4:46:00 PM |
A short-covering eruption could trigger a sizeable squeeze |
@sigmasolveinc |
03/06/2005 12:08:53 PM |
Many shares were sold for a higher price, |
@Makeitgoup1977 |
03/05/2005 7:42:58 PM |
Nevada SoS' database shows the authorized for Pacel |
@eam822 |
03/05/2005 7:29:55 PM |
Awake - I think the math makes the |
@vivek |
03/05/2005 6:47:09 PM |
The Stochastic chart on the bottom shows are |
@Sgmoney |
03/05/2005 5:13:18 PM |
To: ir@pacel.com <ir@pacel.com> |
@joem10003 |
03/05/2005 12:10:16 PM |
As part of its change of corporate domicile |
@Blockedge |
03/05/2005 12:04:50 PM |
Companies are not required to modify the a/s |
@boschhydraulic |
03/05/2005 5:47:08 AM |
I agree it sucks. Unfortunately, there's no |
@leandroglopez |
03/05/2005 5:25:33 AM |
Exactly... they have to modify their Articles of |
@ritalia1 |
03/05/2005 5:16:54 AM |
You haven't been in enough r/s then. |
@36wutanclan |
03/05/2005 5:10:16 AM |
I would love to hear the figures from |
@FFfssdfggg |
03/05/2005 4:25:53 AM |
Until the SEC gets off their A$$, and |
@StockonHighAlert |
03/05/2005 4:25:20 AM |
True "if" there is no excessive dilution. |
@Pra |
03/05/2005 4:20:50 AM |
Not true. I've played a lot of |
@brd2u |
03/05/2005 4:18:24 AM |
I'm not a past investor here. I'm |
@unicorn_angle |
03/05/2005 12:24:32 AM |
matrix, That would make me a lazy due |
@evyloes91 |
03/04/2005 9:35:50 PM |
I recommend you go back and read older |
@willstefan |
03/04/2005 9:15:18 PM |
http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=PCLL&mode=table&table=fib&num1=5&mod |
@Phyllis |
03/04/2005 8:34:31 PM |
KlausVT, thank you. I have this: Gary Musselman, |
@Auzziepup |
03/04/2005 8:15:56 PM |
awake - |
@vizziatech |
03/04/2005 8:00:11 PM |
Thank you for your contribution is this debate; |
@soon2b70 |
03/04/2005 7:59:36 PM |
Awakeinthemorning, My opinion and experience tells me there |
@rhoffman |
03/04/2005 7:32:19 PM |
Thank you for your reply, nevertheless you take |
@W2R73 |
03/04/2005 6:58:57 PM |
Pacel is a r/s heavy diluter stock. |
@Trendchange |
03/04/2005 5:54:14 PM |
I think I might be right with a |
@Gensquared |
03/04/2005 4:56:45 PM |
I just emailed the transfer agent (Transfer Online)to |
@johnchief |
03/03/2005 4:57:25 PM |
Hello, anybody home? |
@faulknerjill |
03/03/2005 4:54:40 PM |
1-1000 r/s effective 25 Feb 2005 |
@stevegekko |
02/25/2005 4:43:45 PM |
Does anybody have any information on this stock ???? |
@maxsmith059 |
02/10/2005 8:33:25 PM |